On 5/16/12 6:09 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-05-15T13:17:11, William Seligman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can post details and logs and whatnot, but I don't think I need to do >> detailed >> debugging. My question is: > > I don't think your rationale holds true, though. Like Andrew said, this > is only ever just written, not read.
So what I really need to learn is how to understand the pengine state enough to issue some sort of correction. In my case, I think "crm resource cleanup <resource-name>" was sufficient. So much to learn! So little time! >> If I were to set up a procedure to delete the contents of >> /var/lib/pengine at system boot, would that cause any problems for >> Pacemaker? Is that state information necessary for the successful >> startup of the pacemaker service at system start, or can I remove them >> before pacemaker starts to prevent problems like this in the future? > > It won't affect pacemaker, but you're hurting debuggability. -- Bill Seligman | Phone: (914) 591-2823 Nevis Labs, Columbia Univ | mailto://[email protected] PO Box 137 | Irvington NY 10533 USA | http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/~seligman/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
