On 6/4/12 7:23 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi
>
> Some questions about HA/Pacemaker and Load Balancing :
>
> - is it possible and safe to make working together LVS (based on hearbeat
> software) and Pacemaker/corosync ?
LVS isn't based on heartbeat. You can use pacemaker to manage your VIPs,
and just leave LVS running in the background. You will need something to
monitor your backend systems and update LVS tables when they
fail/recover - ldirectord does a good job of that.
>
> - is there another known and efficient to provide the load balancing
> functionnality on a Pacemaker cluster ?
Depends what your application is - We use a mixture of LVS and HAProxy.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
