Hi
No, this occurs after :
-adding serveral migration-threshold=1 on around 10 primitives, by crm 
configure edit
-test a service stop to force the linked primitive in Pacemaker to have a 
Failed monitoring and failover the group 
 including the primitive;  the failover is successful.
-but on the cleanup on the group makes the group disappear from crm_mon 
display and after around 2 or 3 mn,
 all the primitives in the group become Failed, exactly at the moment when 
the "Failed application of an update diff"
appear in the syslog

So that means that my modifications by crm configure edit , even if they 
are correct (I've re-checked them) ,
have potentially corrupt the Pacemaker configuration ?

Is there a way to "cleanup" this problem of md5sum ?

Thanks
Alain



De :    Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]>
A :     General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]>
Date :  19/06/2012 01:35
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] What's the meaning of "... Failed application of an 
update diff"
Envoyé par :    [email protected]



On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:38 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> What's the meaning of such syslog messages :
> 1340026364 2012 Jun 18 15:32:44 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.966.1 -> 0.966.2 not applied to 0.966.1: Failed
> application of an update diff

Essentially we're trying to patch the existing configuration with a
change that occurred on another node.
However the md5sum of the result didn't match the expected md5sum.

This can occur normally when things like the group order change.
Was that the case here?

> 1340026365 2012 Jun 18 15:32:45 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.968.1 -> 0.968.2 not applied to 0.968.1: Failed
> application of an update diff
> 1340026365 2012 Jun 18 15:32:45 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.969.1 -> 0.969.2 not applied to 0.969.1: Failed
> application of an update diff
> 1340026365 2012 Jun 18 15:32:45 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.971.2 -> 0.971.3 not applied to 0.971.2: Failed
> application of an update diff
> 1340026365 2012 Jun 18 15:32:45 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.971.18 -> 0.971.19 not applied to 0.971.18:
> Failed application of an update diff
> 1340026366 2012 Jun 18 15:32:46 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.973.1 -> 0.973.2 not applied to 0.973.1: Failed
> application of an update diff
> 1340026366 2012 Jun 18 15:32:46 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.975.1 -> 0.975.2 not applied to 0.975.1: Failed
> application of an update diff
> 1340026366 2012 Jun 18 15:32:46 xna1 daemon notice cib [11129]: notice:
> cib_process_diff: Diff 0.975.17 -> 0.975.18 not applied to 0.975.17:
> Failed application of an update diff
>
> ???
> Thanks
> Alain
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to