Hi, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > While your idea sounds good, I doubt whether parallel mounts being tried are > actually being performed in parallel, just as the exportfs operations. They > all access some common data structures in the kernel, I guess. In that case, > the timeout values may need adjustments. > > Despite of that some RAs may show amazing behavior if executed in parallel (I > guess) ;-)
That should never be the case. If it does, then it's a bug. Thanks, Dejan > Regards, > Ulrich > > >>> <[email protected]> schrieb am 27.07.2012 um 09:15 in Nachricht > <of7cf1dd89.6edcc5c6-onc1257a48.0025bf70-c1257a48.0027c...@bull.net>: > > Hi > > > > For now I had a group with several Filesystem resources followed by the > > exportfs like this : > > group g-FS-EXPORTED fs-A fs-B fs-C fs-D fs-E exportfs-fs-A > > exportfs-fs-B exportfs-fs-C exportfs-fs-D exportfs-fs-E \ > > > > Now, I would like to have all the FS mounted before all the exportfs BUT > > with sequential=false for all Filesystem primitives and sequential=false > > also for all exportfs primitives. > > > > I saw in the Pacemaker Configuration Explained documentation the > > Example 6.11. Ordered sets of unordered resources > > with two ressources A & B starting in parallel and before two ressources C > > & D starting also starting in parallel. I think this > > is exactly what I need. > > > > But : > > > > 1/ I have to remove the group configuration g-FS-EXPORTED , right ? > > or could I have such constraints "inside" the group itself ? > > (based on documentation, I don't think so) > > > > 2/ How can I enter the ordered set of unordered resources in the > > configuration ? > > (in documentation, the examples are given in xml, whereas we can't edit > > the xml cib file, > > and in crm configure order, I can't see the way to do it : > > usage: order <id> score-type: <first-rsc>[:<action>] > > <then-rsc>[:<action>] [symmetrical=<bool>] > > > > 3/ After this configuration, that means that I can't manage the start or > > stop of all these resources with only one command > > as it was the case with the group ? meaning that I have to launch a > > start command on the 10 primitives ? instead of > > the start command on the group ? > > > > Thanks for your help on this. > > Alain > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
