On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-08-22T10:32:57, RaSca <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you Lars, >> In fact, this is what I've done and now everything is ok. But I want to >> understand one last thing: if the ID is calculated with the value of >> interval then why I don't have errors even if I've got two slaves, which >> means that I've got two identical intervals? > > Because they have a different resource id internally. > > That the interval for the master and the slave role can't be identical > is a pacemaker/lrmd bug, I think.
A design limitation in the PE that we never got around to doing anything about. > (Or rather, obscure enough to > configure that it might well be a bug.) It'd be trivial to just append > the role to the operation key too. (It'd cause a few monitors to be > recreated on update, but that'd be harmless.) Not really that trivial actually. Much of the crmd and pengine would be affected. > > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
