Looks like a common timeout issue in network upcoming.

See if corosync is bound to 127.0.0.1 instead of real interface with :
corosync-cmapctl | grep member

Also check if no line is appearing in /var/log/messages :
WARN: cib_peer_callback: Discarding cib_apply_diff message (322) from
server2: not in our membership

Send logs to any web service as pastebin.com.

2012/10/25 James Guthrie <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>
> I've been battling with this problem for a few hours now, I've gone over
> the obvious errors that it could have been with the guys in the linux-ha
> IRC. I'd really like some help in trying to solve this problem.
>
> I have a two node corosync/pacemaker cluster (corosync: 2.0.1 pacemaker:
> 1.1.8). I can get the cluster to work fine, but I can also very easily
> get the cluster into a state from which it seems unable to recover. All
> I have to do is reboot one of the cluster node's hosts. When doing so,
> any resources that were running on it are transferred to the second
> host. When the host comes back up though it appears as OFFLINE in the
> crm_mon of both cluster nodes.
>
> Regardless of what I do on the "offline" host, nothing gets better. If I
> however stop and restart corosync/pacemaker on the other "online" host,
> then everything seems to work again.
>
> I tried waiting a while with one node offline, after a while the online
> node went offline, stating that the other node was now offline. For a
> few minutes the output of crm_mon was different on both hosts (both
> thought the other was online, they were offline). Then finally it
> settled in the exact opposite state as previously.
>
> I've had a long look through the logs but I don't seem to be able to
> pinpoint anything particular that tells me that there is a reason for
> that host failing to be online.
>
> I'd like to attach the logs, but thought that approx 1500 lines of
> additional text in this e-mail might be a bit too much.
>
> How should I best attach the logs and config files? Which parts of the
> logs and config files would most likely reveal the problem in this case?
>
> Regards,
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to