On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Robinson, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Andrew Beekhof >> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:09 PM >> To: General Linux-HA mailing list >> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Who Stole CRM? Just Kidding. But Seriously. >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Robinson, Eric >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> See here; >> >> >> >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/ >> >> >> >> There are versions of CfS for both CRM and PCS. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Digimer >> > >> > >> > I reviewed the documentation links you sent. When I do... >> > >> > yum install -y corosync pacemaker >> > >> > ..I get corosync 1.4 instead of 1.99 or 2.X. And when I do... >> > >> > yum install -y pcs >> > >> > It says there is no package with that name. >> >> It will be available in RHEL as of 6.4 >> Until then, you can grab the srpm from >> http://people.redhat.com/cfeist/pcs/ and run "rpmbuild >> --rebuild /path/to/src.rpm" > > > Thanks much, but the other thing that concerns me is that I appear to be > getting a pretty old corosync from the yum install command. The docs seem to > indicate that we need corosync 2.X but yum is installing 1.4. That's why I am > thinking that I must have the wrong repo.
RHEL6 is (and will remain) based on 1.4.x - you have the right repo :) 2.x is only "required" if you want pcs to be able to create and manage corosync.conf > Here's what my repo files currently say: > > [clusterlabs] > name=High Availability/Clustering server technologies (epel-6) > baseurl=http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/epel-6 > type=rpm-md > gpgcheck=0 > enabled=1 > > [scientific-linux] > name=Scientific Linux > baseurl=http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6/x86_64/os/ > enabled=0 > > > > -- > Eric Robinson > > > > Disclaimer - October 29, 2012 > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee > you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views > or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might > not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present > in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or > damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. > This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
