On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Robinson, Eric <[email protected]> wrote: > This is just crazy as heck.
Basically you're hitting a bug in 1.1.8 I made the "is node X alive?" check much stricter but there are certain timing windows which produce a false positive. You should be fine after applying the following two patches (or building from HEAD): + Andrew Beekhof (4 weeks ago) b87494d: High: legacy: Skip peer process check if the process list is empty in crm_is_corosync_peer_active() + Andrew Beekhof (4 weeks ago) 90fb225: High: legacy: Relax the 'active' check for plugin based clusters to avoid false negatives > The rings are fine and both nodes have joined the cluster, but when I start > Pacemaker no DC ever gets elected. > > > [root@ha09b corosync]# corosync-cfgtool -s > Printing ring status. > Local node ID 990554304 > RING ID 0 > id = 192.168.10.59 > status = ring 0 active with no faults > RING ID 1 > id = 198.51.100.59 > status = ring 1 active with no faults > [root@ha09b corosync]# corosync-objctl|grep member > runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.990554304.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.10.59) r(1) > ip(198.51.100.59) > runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.990554304.join_count=1 > runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.990554304.status=joined > runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.973777088.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.10.58) r(1) > ip(198.51.100.58) > runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.973777088.join_count=1 > runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.973777088.status=joined > > -- > Eric Robinson > > > Disclaimer - November 2, 2012 > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee > you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views > or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might > not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present > in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or > damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. > This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
