Clear! In order to do fence and crash a node, is there a specific HW requirement to do this?
________________________________ From: Digimer <[email protected]> To: Hermes Flying <[email protected]> Cc: General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:52 PM Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Corosync on cluster with 3+ nodes On 12/02/2012 02:27 PM, Hermes Flying wrote: > When you say: > > "So if corosync dies, pacemaker loses it's foundation and falls over dead." > > You mean pacemaker instance in all of nodes, right? No, just the pacemaker instance on the machine that lost corosync. > Also (my emphasis >><<) > "The other node(s) in the cluster will declare the >>node<< as failed, > fence it and then decide if any services need to be restarted" > > Which >>node<< are your talking about? Itself? It will try to restart > itself if corosync i.e. pacemaker dies? Whichever node that lost it's corosync version. If corosync dies, pacemaker can't and won't do anything. It's dead. It will not restart. The other node(s) in the cluster will declare that node lost and will fence it. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
