Hi! Maybe it helps to know that we see intermittent (a few times per day) ring failures here, also, but as we have redundant rings, the nodes still can talk to each other.
Regards, Ulrich >>> Muhammad Sharfuddin <[email protected]> schrieb am 14.12.2012 um >>> 13:22 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 14:09 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi Muhammad, > > > > also find my ansawer inline... > > > > On 12/14/2012 12:55 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:47 +0500, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > > >> please find me replies in-line > > >> > > >> On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:13 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote: > > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > >>> > > >>> As you are using Multcast (MCAST) > > >>> > > >> yes > > >> > > > so using Unicast instead of MCAST, would be a solution ? > > > > > > > It COULD be a solution, if the network was the problem. > > > Ok, will try it. > But as this problem is not **frequent**, I mean this cluster was running > almost since 2 months without any error, therefore after switching to > Unicast I have to wait for at least next 2 months to be sure that using > Unicast is a fix. > > > Some years ago I wrote a tiny programm to send MCAST with > > high load and to count drops - maybe I can reload the code > > and sent it to you, if you are interested. Its GPL so free > > to use under the terms of GPL and no warranty :) > > > > > Waiting.. thanks, appreciated a lot. > > -- > Regards, > Muhammad Sharfuddin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
