>Not quite yet. >I had a chat with Lon today and the "checkpoint" backend is close to >what we want but requires cman and openais. >Those two dependancies need to be removed.
>Essentially you'll basically just be running corosync (instead of >qpid) on the hosts (no need for pacemaker). >If you happen to have some C skills I'd be happy to point you in the >right direction. Fair enough, I'll continue to limp along. It's not unlikely that our devs will work out a safe active/active arrangement in the near future and at that point I won't really care about stonith anyway. Unfortunately I haven't twiddled with C in about 17 years, or I might take a crack at it. I do eagerly anticipate this working at some point though as there are a few other places we could probably use it. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
