>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 22.02.2013 um 14:17 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2013-02-22T13:55:47, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > a quick check in the reference manual and HA-manual showed nothing for that > topic. At least I found out that "wdt" is a better pattern to look for: > > The HA manual doesn't detail how to setup the hardware. > > > # lsmod |grep wdt > > xen_wdt 13525 0 > > hpwdt 14180 0 > > iTCO_wdt 18032 0 > > iTCO_vendor_support 13718 1 iTCO_wdt > > ib700wdt 13290 0 > > advantechwdt 13440 1 > > acquirewdt 13288 0 > > wdt_pci 14081 0 > > > > Still wondering which of those is the correct (TM) one... > > I can't tell you. The hardware watchdog driver is, well, a driver for a > hardware watchdog. I can't tell you which hardware you have.
I know, but shouldn't wrong watchdog modules fail to load? Or at least shouldn't successful modules leave some message in syslog? The way it is now, you could only do guessing what watchdog I have and what module is connected to /dev/watchdog, right? I feel the interface could be improved: # find /sys /proc -iname watch\* /sys/devices/virtual/misc/watchdog /sys/class/misc/watchdog /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh A "name" entry would be quite helpful. > > As a fallback and for testing, you can use the softdog module. Will try. Regards, Ulrich > > > Regards, > Lars _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
