On 2013-03-15T11:43:56, Dimitri Maziuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, I suppose. I meant going Open/CloudStack.
> (We get to write buzzword-compliant funding proposals, or I don't get to
> eat. So my perspective is skewed towards the hottest shiny du jour...)
Yeah, I'd agree that today there are scenarios where "a cloud" makes
more sense then a traditional HA environment. OpenStack et al still have
to up their HA game a bit, though.
> > And the concept of HA clusters predates "the cloud" slightly.
> Relevant if you're looking at maintenance/upgrade on an existing
> cluster. Patching heartbeat to manage 200 services independently sounds
> like a new project.
Right. Thankfully, we already have that, it's called pacemaker ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
