>>> "Angel L. Mateo" <[email protected]> schrieb am 22.04.2013 um 11:55 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > El 22/04/13 11:20, emmanuel segura escribió: > > Hello Angel > > > > In this thread > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.release.rhel5/6395 you can > > find the answer to your question > > > In that thread I can see that cLVM does not support snapshot. There is
Oops! I didn't know that. Maybe be cLVM (Clustered LVM) should be renamed to lLVM (less LVM)... ;-) > a link pointing to dd as a workaround for the snapshot (but I have a > 10TB FS and dd is not an option). > > So my question continue, is clvm really needed? Or "legacy" LVM with > fencing and stonich mechanism would be enough? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
