>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> schrieb am 15.05.2013 um 10:35 in >>> Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 2013-05-15T09:53:31, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I think there is a bug in crm shell's "rename": >> I renamed a colocation constraint named "col_Xen_VMs_cfs2" to > "col_Xen_VMs_cfs_mir" >> >> After that I see: >> <rsc_colocation id="col_Xen_VMs_cfs_mir" (...) >> <resource_set id="col_Xen_VMs_cfs2-0" sequential="false" > >> (...) >> >> I wonder: Shouldn't the resource_set id be renamed as well? > > No. There's not really a reason to do that, the set id isn't exposed by > the shell, or is it? > > Rename isn't recursive.
So if I rename A to B, then create a new A, there won't be any conflict? AFAIR, id must be unique. Regards, Ulrich _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
