On 05/14/2013 04:20 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2013-05-14T15:59:05, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Appart from a larger restructuring of the code, >> >> For which I'd still like to hear a good explanation. Mind, this >> is not to say that this or that version is better, but that such >> a huge change calls for a serious effort on part of the >> developers and users. > > As far as I understand it (and Fabio has confirmed that), this is > intended to merge the heartbeat LVM and the rgmanager LVM agent, with > the goal to ultimately reduce code duplication.
We actually agreed to this merge at LinuxConf 2010 in Boston :) you were there ;) Beside code duplication, there is no reason for rgmanager agents to exists upstream anylonger, since rgmanager and the other components from the old Red Hat stack are deprecated, but they still cover use cases that heartbeat agents do not. Effectively, this would be a full integration process to have one set that does it all. Clearly, the initial merge is bumpy, but the final result also means that users will be able to cover more deployment scenarios and the code is maintained by more developer. Fabio _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
