----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lars Marowsky-Bree" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: "Jonathan Brassow" <[email protected]>, "Fabio M. Di Nitto" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 3:35:29 AM > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, "exclusive" activation > > On 2013-05-15T13:50:45, Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are we, in this discussion, perhaps losing the focus on the base > submission of the code merge? > > Can we separate that (IMHO rather worthwhile) patch set from the > exclusive activation part?
I don't think we are losing focus, I think we're really close to finalizing the final bits here. If no one objects to the idea you proposed about using a single tag for the entire cluster to ensure exclusive activation, the patches remain similar to the way it is now, I just strip out a bunch of unnecessary stuff. I'm waiting to hear more feedback from Jonathan about this new direction before I act on anything. -- Vossel > (Which I happen to have no strong opinion on, > unless it is already shipped - in which case we need to support it.) > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
