On 24/06/2013, at 8:56 PM, Athanasios Kostopoulos 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear list,

You might have more luck on the corosync mailing list.
Not all their developers are on this one IIRC.

> 
> I have the following problem when trying to implement a two-node failover
> cluster, using Hetzner as the hosting provider.
> 
> my corosync.conf is as follows:
> 
> # Please read the corosync.conf.5 manual page
> compatibility: whitetank
> 
> totem {
> version: 2
> secauth: off
> interface {
> member {
> memberaddr: 144.76.91.XXX
> }
> member {
> memberaddr: 5.9.121.XXX
> }
> ringnumber: 0
> bindnetaddr: 5.9.121.0
> mcastport: 5405
> ttl: 1
> }
> transport: udpu
> }
> 
> logging {
> fileline: off
> to_logfile: yes
> to_syslog: yes
> debug: on
> logfile: /var/log/cluster/corosync.log
> debug: off
> timestamp: on
> logger_subsys {
> subsys: AMF
> debug: off
> }
> }
> 
> the problem is that 5.9.121.XXX binds correctly (and appears under crm_mon
> to be a part of the cluster)
> udp        0      0 5.9.121.XXX:5405         0.0.0.0:*
>      8281/corosync
> 
> but 144.76.91.XXX fails and binds to localhost instead.
> udp        0      0 127.0.0.1:5405          0.0.0.0:*
>    7889/corosync
> 
> 
> Analysis of tcpdump logs indicates that 144.76.91.XXX replies to
> 5.9.121.XXX with an ICMP type 3 (destination unreachable), code 3 (port
> unreachable).
> 
> corosync -f output will print repeatedly:
> 
> Jun 24 12:53:28 corosync [TOTEM ] Totem is unable to form a cluster because
> of an operating system or network fault. The most common cause of this
> message is that the local firewall is configured improperly.
> 
> 
> UDP traffic is enabled between the 2 hosts, no firewalls are currently in
> place and I am using Debian (thus no SELinux).
> Any ideas for a work around between this issue? Is it even possible to
> create a cluster with 2 machines on different subnets or do I need to order
> servers within the same subnet?
> Thanks in advance for any replies.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to