On 02/07/2013, at 8:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 02.07.2013 12:27, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >> On 2013-07-02T11:05:01, Vladislav Bogdanov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> One thing I see immediately, is that node utilization attributes are >>> deleted after I do 'load update' with empty node utilization sections. >>> That is probably not specific to this patch. >> >> Yes, that isn't specific to that. >> >>> I have that attributes dynamic, set from a RA (as node configuration may >>> vary, I prefer to detect how much CPU and RAM I have and set utilization >>> accordingly rather then put every hardware change into CIB). >> >>> Or may be it is possible to use transient utilization attributes? >>> I don't think so... Ugh, that would be nice. >> >> Yes, that's exactly what you need here. > > I know, but I do not expect that to be implemented soon. Together with > cluster-wide attributes for which I use hack with tickets now. But > tickets currently are quite limited - they have only 4 states, so it is > impossible to put f.e. number there. > > I fully understand Andrew's point when he is unwilling to implement > features for just two setups, so... What feature am I not considering here? I don't follow. > Probably I need to extend crmsh with > site-specific patch until that is implemented. That would be acceptable > work-around for me... And chance to learn python nevertheless ;) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
