Hi!

I don't know whether this helps, but in a different configuration we saw
monitor timeouts for ipaddr2 when there was a high I/O load.
Meanwhile we have upgraded all the software, but we had disabled most monitos
for ipaddr2.

Regards,
Ulrich

>>> RaSca <[email protected]> schrieb am 07.08.2013 um 16:37 in
Nachricht
<[email protected]>:
> Hi all,
> I have a big Pacemaker (1.1.9-1512) cluster with 9 nodes and almost 200
> virtual machines (with the same storage on the bottom). Everything is
> based upon KVM and libvirt.
> Each VM has got a location, based upon a cloned ping resource on each
> node that pings three hosts on the net.
> 
> The problem I got is that when I clone a VM (using virt-clone)
> everything works fine until I try to add a new ping check.
> At this time, for some reason the master ping resource of the node
> fails, with errors like this:
> 
> Jul 30 15:34:58 kvm09 lrmd[23467]:  warning: child_timeout_callback:
> res_ping_connections_monitor_5000 process (PID 26406) timed out
> 
> We're investigating on potentially network problems (obviously the
> network men says that those are impossible, but when the problems
> happens there are sometimes high ping latencies on the node), but what I
> find very strange is that things breaks up ONLY when I add a location
> based upon ping, not for example when I add the storage's order and
> colocation for VM.
> 
> So my two questions:
> 
> 1) Are there limitations about how many ping location can be declared?
> 2) Is this one (one vm = one ping location) the best practice to monitor
> the connections of the nodes?
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
> -- 
> RaSca
> Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene!
> [email protected] 
> http://www.miamammausalinux.org 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 


_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to