On 22/08/2013, at 10:08 PM, Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> wrote: > Hi, > > Our setup uses some cluster wide pieces of meta information. Think > access control lists for resource instances used by some utilities or > some common configuration data used by the resource agents. Currently > this info is stored in local files on the nodes or replicated in each > primitive as parameters.
Are you aware that resources can - have multiple sets of parameters, and - share sets of parameters The combination might be useful here. > I find this suboptimal, as keeping them in > sync is a hassle. It is possible to store such stuff in the "fake" > parameter of unmanaged Dummy resources, but that clutters the status > output. Can somebody offer some advice in this direction? Or is this > idea a pure heresy? > -- > Thanks, > Feri. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
