On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:55:04 +0100 "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think a concrete use example would be helpful to understand what > the new syntaxes are really about... Well, the crmsh implementation is simply a syntax for what is already in Pacemaker, and the reasoning for those features are documented there. But I think the general goal for both of these new location constraint types is to allow a single location constraint to apply to multiple resources. Either by applying the constraint to a resource set, or by using regular expressions to apply the constraint to several resources. -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
