>>> Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com> schrieb am 25.01.2014 um 18:07 in Nachricht <20140125170730.gb9...@suse.de>: > On 2014-01-24T10:52:56, Tom Parker <tpar...@cbnco.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Kristoffer. >> >> How is tuning done for lrm now? > > What do you want to tune? > > The LRM_MAX_CHILDREN setting is still (okay: again ;-), that was broken > in one update) honored as before. Or you can use the "node-action-limit" > property in the CIB to achieve the same, without setting environment > variables; in case you don't like the automatic attempt at load > dampening that pacemaker deploys.
Talking on "node-action-limit": I think I read in the syslog (not the best way to document changes) that the "migration-limit" parameter is obsoleted by "node-action-limit" in lastest SLES. Ist that correct? If so I think that's a poor decision, because a Xen live migration for a multi-GB-RAM-VM is a heavy weight process, while other actions are most likely much more lightweight, and VM migration probably does not benefit for parallel execution or multiple CPUs as it's very much I/O-heavy (not to say net-heavy). crmd[16709]: warning: cluster_option: Using deprecated name 'migration-limit' for cluster option 'node-action-limit' Regards, Ulrich > > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
