On 05/05/2014 02:36 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4 May 2014, at 4:22 pm, Fabian Herschel <[email protected]> wrote:
I would create the group with the meta attributr for unordered resources.
Meta odered="false"
Noooo. Use a colocation set.
Could you explain your "Nooooooooo"? Whats wrong in using the unordered
feature? Why was this meta attribute added to groups, if we shouldn't
use it?
Von Samsung-Tablet gesendet
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Vladimir Romanov <[email protected]>
Datum:03.05.2014 10:29 (GMT+01:00)
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [Linux-HA] How I can create unordered group of resources
Hello!
I try create Master/Slave cluster using Pacemaker on Centos 6.5 (CRM+PCS).
I create master/slave statefull resource. My setup also have many other
resources (IPs, Routes, LSB...). I one of resources is failed on first
mode I want to move all resources to another node. Now I use group to
create this setup. But when I kill -9 some process all processes listen
below also restarted. That is best practice for this task?
--
Vladimir Romanov
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
