On 01/10/14 03:58 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Digimer <[email protected]> wrote:
Personally, I would not upgrade. If you do, you will want to test outside
of production first.
Of course, I would always do that anyway, even without a major version
number change.
Corosync needed cman to be a quorum provider in the 1.x series. In 2.x, it
became it's own quorum provider and cman was no longer needed. Last I heard
upstream, pacemaker on EL6 is only supported on corosync 1.4 + cman.
There is a pacemaker update too, to 1.1.12+git20140723.483f48a-1.1
I'm sure you're not concerned about paid support, but it does mean that the
corosync 1.4 stack is much better tested on EL6 than 2.x is.
OK, thanks. What I am really trying to figure out is exactly what the
network_ha-clustering_Stable repo is for. Presumably, from the name, they
wouldn't put anything in there that isn't ready for production?
--Greg
Who runs the repo? It's not a name I am familiar with.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
