Hi, On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:25:02PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > I discovered an inconsistency in crm shell crmsh-1.2.6-0.35.11 > (SLES11): When you add a primitive interactively using an > unknown parameter, you can commit the change.
IIRC, that depends on the check-mode option. > However if you > use "crm configure edit <primitive>", after saving you'll see: > "Do you want to edit again?" > > My assumption was that answering "no" will keep the changes as written, but > in fact the changes seem to be discarded when answering "no": > [...] > Do you want to edit again? no > crm(live)configure# commit > INFO: apparently there is nothing to commit > INFO: try changing something first My best guess is that the edit operation doesn't observe the above rc option or at least not in the same way. > What about changing the question to "What now? (Keep|Fix|Revert)? Apparently, keep didn't seem to be an option at the time :) > (With the obvious semantics: Keep=Keeps the changes as written, Fix=Try again > to fix the problem, Revert=Revert to the loaded configuration) I assume that this could be improved, but it is not clear in which way. I wonder how does the crmsh v2.0 behave in this case. Thanks, Dejan > I assume I did something dirty on my system: Just updated the RA on one node, > so the other node didn't know about the new RA, but anyway... > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
