>>> Gourav Jain <[email protected]> schrieb am 08.09.2014 um 14:25 in
Nachricht
<CAGgcjOKS6f7mCRv1hENkUJoOibgkx5NEGjbp3UqDLAEAtvEA=q...@mail.gmail.com>:

(This message was delayed significantly!)

I guess as sbd is designed to work completely independent of a network (or at 
least of the main network), it doesn't care about IP addresses and /etc/hosts...

> Hi,
> 
> I have setup a two-node cluster on Ubuntu 12.04 with
> cman-corosync-pacemaker. For stonith, I am using SBD fencing. To keep the
> corosync communication separate from regular network traffic, I made
> following entries on my nodes in the /etc/hosts file:
> 192.168.0.1         ubuntua
> 192.168.0.2         ubuntub
> and used ubuntua and ubuntub as the node names in my cluster.conf. Although
> this works to keep the cluster traffic separate, I can't get sbd to
> recognize these dummy names. I tried using "allocate <ubuntua/ubuntub>" and
> then using "sbd -n" option to force sbd to watch for ubuntua/b, but it
> doesn't work. sbd list command still shows sbd creating slots for actual
> hostnames and a test message sent to a dummy hostname does not get sent to
> the respective node.
> 
> Does anyone know, how to make "-n" option work in sdb?
> 
> Regards,
> Gourav
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha 
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems 




_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to