On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:56:14PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > 19.01.2015 16:30, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >Hi Vladislav, > > > >>[...] > >>Fix transition start detection. > >> > >>--- a/modules/constants.py 2014-12-22 08:48:26.000000000 +0000 > >>+++ b/modules/constants.py 2014-12-22 13:07:43.945077805 +0000 > >>@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ > >> # r.group(3) file number > >> transition_patt = [ > >> # transition start > >>- "crmd.* do_te_invoke: Processing graph ([0-9]+) .*derived from > >>(.*/pe-[^-]+-(%%)[.]bz2)", > >>+ "pengine.* process_pe_message: Calculated Transition ([0-9]+): > >>(.*/pe-[^-]+-(%%)[.]bz2)", > > > >Do you know when this changed? > > Original message (from do_te_invoke) was downgraded into the 'info' > priority a long ago (probably during that Andrew's massive logging > cleanup), while process_pe_message' one still remains at the > 'notice' level. First my patch has 2012-12-26 as its date (for > crmsh-1.2.4), so the change was done before that. iirc > process_pe_message's message was always there, both messages were > printed before that cleanup.
Ah, that rings the bell. But there's more than just that one: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/network:ha-clustering:Factory/pacemaker/bug-806256_pacemaker-log-level-notice.patch?expand=1 > >The reason I'm asking is that crmsh tries to support multiple > >pacemaker versions, so I'm not sure if we can just replace this > >pattern. > > > >>Make tar follow symlinks. > >> > >>--- a/modules/crm_pssh.py 2013-08-12 12:52:11.000000000 +0000 > >>+++ b/modules/crm_pssh.py 2013-08-12 12:53:32.666444069 +0000 > >>@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ > >> dir = "/%s" % r.group(1) > >> red_pe_l = [x.replace("%s/" % r.group(1), "") for x in pe_l] > >> common_debug("getting new PE inputs %s from %s" % (red_pe_l, > >> node)) > >>- cmdline = "tar -C %s -cf - %s" % (dir, ' '.join(red_pe_l)) > >>+ cmdline = "tar -C %s -chf - %s" % (dir, ' '.join(red_pe_l)) > > > >Just curious: where did you find links in the PE input > >directories? > > Ahm, you know, systems are soooo different around a world ;) True. And I _do_ appreciate that fact. > And system administrators sometimes want to do weird things ;) Which is their prerogative too. > Actually that one is specific to my diskless clusters, but it wont > hurt anyways. Diskless? Cool. Cheers, Dejan > > > >And many thanks for the patches! > > > >Cheers, > > > >Dejan > >> > >> > >>Best, > >>Vladislav > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Linux-HA mailing list > >>Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > >>http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >>See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > >_______________________________________________ > >Linux-HA mailing list > >Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > >http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
