Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> writes: > Hi Kristoffer, > > may be it is worth to silently (or at least with rc=0) allow deletion of > non-existing or already-deleted configuration statements? > > Background for that is that I keep track of the all configuration > statements myself, and, when I delete some resources (together with > accompanying constraints), they may go "out-of-order" to 'crm configure > delete', thus some constraints are automatically deleted when deleting > "lower" resource before the "upper" one. That leads to the whole crm > script to fail.
Hmm, I am not sure about doing this by default, since we would want to show some kind of indication that a resource name may have been misspelled for example... But I can imagine having a command line flag for being more flexible in this regard. I will look at how it works now. BTW, I suspect that passing the --wait flag to crm while running commands in this way may help you. Although I am not sure I entirely understand what it is you are doing :) Cheers, Kristoffer > > Best, > Vladislav > > 13.02.2015 17:03, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Following fails with the current crmsh (e4b10ee). >> # crm resource stop cl-http-lv >> # crm resource stop cl-http-lv >> ERROR: crm_diff apparently failed to produce the diff (rc=0) >> ERROR: Failed to commit updates to cl-http-lv >> # echo $? >> 1 >> >> >> Best, >> Vladislav >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // kgronl...@suse.com _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
