On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:23:10AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> applied patches 2-9 to netdev-2.6 queue (thus -mm, etc.).
> 
> Not sure where patch #1 went, I don't see it (unless #1 is the reformat 
> patch)

#1 did touch only the encapsulation pseudo devices provided by the NETROM
and ROSE network protocols in net/netrom and net/rose so I did cc only to
netdev.  Thought you'd not care.  In case you do, it's attached below.

  Ralf

 netrom/nr_dev.c |    8 ++++----
 rose/rose_dev.c |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: bk-afu/net/netrom/nr_dev.c
===================================================================
--- bk-afu.orig/net/netrom/nr_dev.c     2005-02-04 23:40:49.102007960 +0000
+++ bk-afu/net/netrom/nr_dev.c  2005-02-04 23:40:53.618321376 +0000
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 
 int nr_rx_ip(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 {
-       struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       struct net_device_stats *stats = netdev_priv(dev);
 
        if (!netif_running(dev)) {
                stats->rx_errors++;
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 static int nr_rebuild_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
        struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
-       struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       struct net_device_stats *stats = netdev_priv(dev);
        struct sk_buff *skbn;
        unsigned char *bp = skb->data;
        int len;
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
 
 static int nr_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 {
-       struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       struct net_device_stats *stats = netdev_priv(dev);
        dev_kfree_skb(skb);
        stats->tx_errors++;
        return 0;
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
 
 static struct net_device_stats *nr_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
 {
-       return (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       return netdev_priv(dev);
 }
 
 void nr_setup(struct net_device *dev)
Index: bk-afu/net/rose/rose_dev.c
===================================================================
--- bk-afu.orig/net/rose/rose_dev.c     2005-02-04 23:40:49.101008112 +0000
+++ bk-afu/net/rose/rose_dev.c  2005-02-04 23:40:53.619321224 +0000
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 static int rose_rebuild_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
        struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
-       struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       struct net_device_stats *stats = netdev_priv(dev);
        unsigned char *bp = (unsigned char *)skb->data;
        struct sk_buff *skbn;
 
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
 
 static int rose_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 {
-       struct net_device_stats *stats = (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       struct net_device_stats *stats = netdev_priv(dev);
 
        if (!netif_running(dev)) {
                printk(KERN_ERR "ROSE: rose_xmit - called when iface is 
down\n");
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 
 static struct net_device_stats *rose_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
 {
-       return (struct net_device_stats *)dev->priv;
+       return netdev_priv(dev);
 }
 
 void rose_setup(struct net_device *dev)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to