Hello Gustavo,
I appreciate you working on keeping up the kernel and maintaining some
of the older feature areas like AX.25, Netrom, etc. Other than auditing
your code changes, can you tell me what you're changing? I've been
attempting to find who / where does regression tests for the Linus
kernel to potentially ADD test suites for this area. In the recent
past, we have seen a lot of toxicity creep into the kernel because no
one is testing their changes and backing out this toxic code out of
released Linux distributions takes a VERY long time.
I'm willing to try and help here but I really would like to follow some
team's guidelines of how they would like tests to be created, supported,
etc. Be it in VMs, containers, specific automation languages, etc.
--David
KI6ZHD
On 10/26/2017 10:50 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
The aim of this patchset is firstly to refactor code in nr_route.c in order to
make it
easier to read and maintain and, secondly, to mark some expected switch
fall-throughs
in preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
I have to mention that I did not implement any unit test.
If someone has any suggestions on how I could test this piece of code
it'd be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Changes in v2:
- Make use of the swap macro and remove inline keyword as suggested by
Walter Harms and Kevin Dawson.
Changes in v3:
- Update subject for both patches.
- Add this cover letter as suggested by David Miller.
Gustavo A. R. Silva (2):
net: netrom: nr_route: refactor code in nr_add_node
net: netrom: nr_route: mark expected switch fall-throughs
net/netrom/nr_route.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
