Sorry for the delay, I was away in the UK when you replied.
> Jonathan, this is unnecessary flamebait.
Is it ?
> While the FlexNet implementation source code is unavailable,
> the protocol is simple and obviously known enough that
> there exist at least 3 independent implementations.
OK, simple test for you or any other FlexNet person.
Can you do one of the following:
a) Give me a pointer to a web site containing the FlexNet specifications.
b) Tell me where to get a paper copy, I can meet you at HB if you want :-)
(Me and Thomas work in the same city).
Its not a problem if its in German, I can get it translated easily enough, and then
I'd make the spec available.
I wanted to add FlexNet to Linux a few years ago, and all I got was a particularly
horrible brick wall. In fact the brick wall I got was particularly racist in character
I remember. So I decided to do ROSE instead, after discounting Texnet as being dead.
> Tom
Jonathan
