There oughta be a law against "nested indentation." Four deep is getting kinda rediculous: >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> > Karl F. Larsen >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 3:04 PM >> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > Subject: PostgeSQL working Yes, I know; I made it five. At least I didn't include the WHOLE message. There oughta be a law against that too! Actually, I've seen some NNTP readers that do exactly that: prohibit including the entire text when replying to a post. I guess some people out there don't realize that after they hit "r" (or these days, click "reply"), they can edit out parts of the original msg that are .... irrelevant, superfluous, redundant, etc. And...while I'm ranting and raving, I think thier ought to be a law against bad spelling and grammar (sp?). Like using "there" when you should of used "they're" (or using "of" instead of "have"). Maybe a national spelling and grammar test before your (you're? yore?) allowed on the internet? And writing incomplete sentences. And, there ought to be a law against incoherent babelling in a public forum. Babel, babel, babel...... p.s. There oughta be a law against "re: <the same old subject>" when the actual topic changed days ago.
