On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Gareth Rowlands wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 1999 19:16:19 +0200 (EET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Thanks,
>
> Here's another little one in pbbs_rcv.c that I would have thought
> should have been picked up by the compiler.
ah, another really stupid one. Thanks.
> Oh, BTW, Paul (APL) instigated and is testing some code which handles
> NNTP "Distribution:" headers and maps both ways between say,
> "Distribution: world" <> "@WWW", "Distribution: europe" <> "@EU"
> etc. when gating NNTP <> PBBS
>
> Interested ?
Dunno if it makes much sense. If you can figure out how to make it
properly configurable.... IMHO distribution definition on the NNTP side
should be done per the group hierarchy. But as always, if you think it
makes sense, feel free to write the code - that's why we're using GPL
anyway. 8-)
> *** pbbs_rcv.c.1 Sun Feb 7 00:37:31 1999
> --- pbbs_rcv.c Sun Feb 7 00:37:37 1999
PS. Please send unified diffs (generated by diff -u), i find quite a bit
more readable.
- Hessu
