First of all sorry for the empty post, I pressed the wrong button in Lotus
Notes.

> I have never tried rip98, even didn't remember of its existence ''''':-(,,,,,,,

It was invented by John G8BPQ as a more RF friendly version of RIP-2.

> Rip-2 is very simple, it cannot be so bad...

It is simple, but looking at the protocol you'll see a lot of optional fields
full of 0's that aren't used. A RIP-98 entry is much smaller and can get many
individual routing entries per 256 byte packet, whereas RIP-2 only gets a
handful.

> But: does rip98 support classeless subnetting (routes+mask) ? That's very
> important. Rip-1 didn't.

It uses the concept of an IP address and the number of significant bits, like
the routing system in NET/NOS.

> Also, rip-2 has a very nice feature: You can define a "password" that must be
> in the update to be accepted (and there is also a way to use MD5...).

Not as such, but you can list stations whom you trust to send you updates. I
really can't remember the details of the top of my head though.

> >Its been in the ax25-utils for years as rip98d.
> Where could I fetch the documentation of rip98 ??

I remember a sort of RFC on RIP-98 was written by Darryl G7LED many years ago,
but I never got a copy. Essentially RIP-98 is a reformatted RIP-2 which saves
space. The rest is down to implementation away from the protocol itself.

> --
> Saludos de Juli�n/EA4ACL
> -.-

Jonathan  HB9/G4KLX
*************************************************************************

Ce message et toutes les pi�ces jointes (ci-apr�s le "message") sont
confidentiels et �tablis � l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autoris�e est interdite. 
Tout message �lectronique est susceptible d'alt�ration. 
La SOCIETE GENERALE d�cline toute responsabilit� au titre de ce message
s'il a �t� alt�r�, d�form� ou falsifi�.

                                ********

This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. 
E-mails are susceptible to alteration.   
SOCIETE GENERALE shall not be liable for the message if altered,
changed or falsified. 

*************************************************************************

Reply via email to