Message is undeliverable.
Reason: cc:Mail Post Office is shutdown.
Please retry later.
Original text follows:
---------------------
Received: from schneider.fr by mail.schneider.fr (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.01.01)
; Tue, 11 May 99 22:21:56 +0100
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by schneider.fr (8.8.5/8.6.12) id WAA25714 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 May 1999 22:12:21 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nic.funet.fi(128.214.248.6)via SMTP by heraut, id smtpdAAAa006FN; Tue
May 11 22:12:16 1999
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:7702 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu" ident:
"NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <15809-4112>; Tue, 11 May 1999
23:20:59 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <154422-17480>; Tue, 11 May 1999
12:53:37 -0400
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <155102-17480>; Tue, 11 May 1999 12:42:39 -0400
Received: from andorinha.ist.utl.pt ([193.136.132.85]:3972 "EHLO andorinha.ist.utl.pt"
ident: "root") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <155528-17483>; Tue, 11 May 1999
11:28:17 -0400
Received: from localhost (martin@localhost)by andorinha.ist.utl.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with
ESMTP id QAA07879;Tue, 11 May 1999 16:10:31 GMT
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 16:10:30 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
From: Jorge Matias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Max Xfer at 9k6 Half Duplex!
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-hams-outgoing
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Richard Adams wrote:
> According to Jorge Matias: While burning my CPU.
> >
> > Hi guys!
> > I have an YAM modem at 9k6 and at the other side it has a USCC 9k6
> > modem.
> > At the time of the tests the channel was completely free.
> > To measure the performance of the link I tried an FTP connection to the
> > other side. I could get xfers of 460bytes/sec transfering files with
> > 40-50k of size.
> > Is this xfer rate below average or is it normal?
>
> On a point to point link we get +/- 700b/s average.
> Once when we did some testing we got it up to 800b/s but there was absolutly
> no other traffic in between.
>
> Both sides use PA0HZP SCC cards with Z85230 chips, MTU = 512 window is 4
> packets, the modems are both G3RUH compatable modems from dds electronics.
>
> We have our params, all set to a minimum, the trx's are Xtal home made 23cm
> interlink I. I cant remember the callsign of the designer of the Interlink
> TRX's, its a German callsign that i can remember.
Was that test Half Duplex or any other mode? My test is in Half Duplex,
and both sides have MTU=256 and /proc/.../maximum_packet_length=256.
> --
> Regards Richard.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Regards,
Jorge Matias
- -- --- ------------------------------------------------- --- -- -
Computer Science Student at Instituto Superior Tecnico (Lisbon)
A3000/060 32Mb -[Ariadne][MFC III][CV64]- LinuxOS 2.0.36
QRZ: CT2HBZ - E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
