hahaha, i just got the same undeliverable message as Ivo did, I think someone
should remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list :)
On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 04:30:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Following address had delivery problems:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], 550 User unknown.
> .... Original message follows ....
>
> >From vger.rutgers.edu!owner-linux-hams-outgoing Wed Jun 16 16:37:01 1999 remote
>from alushta.NL.net
> Received: from nic.funet.fi ([128.214.248.6]:29960 "EHLO nic.funet.fi" ident:
>"NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by alushta.NL.net with ESMTP id <4509-23279>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999
>16:36:57 +0200
> Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2]:49009 "EHLO vger.rutgers.edu") by
>nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <S1889AbPFPOgj>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:36:39 +0300
> Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id <S154980AbPFPOfa>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999
>10:35:30 -0400
> Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <S154894AbPFPOcg>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:32:36 -0400
> Received: from liadun.dundee.lia.net ([196.38.155.130]:18040 "EHLO
>liadun.dundee.lia.net") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <S154949AbPFPObR>; Wed, 16
>Jun 1999 10:31:17 -0400
> Received: from dun01.dundee.lia.net (jab.home) [196.38.155.131] (mail)
> by liadun.dundee.lia.net with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
> id 10uGjO-0007G9-00; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:31:59 +0200
> Received: from sjb by jab.home with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> id 10uGEJ-0002zf-00; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 15:59:51 +0200
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 15:59:51 +0200
> From: Sarel Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bounced messages from the mailing list
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Ivo Simicevic on Wed, Jun 16,
>1999 at 02:16:55PM +0200
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-hams-outgoing
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 02:16:55PM +0200, Ivo Simicevic wrote:
> > > It looks like your sending the message to at least 2 addresses.
> > > The first might be [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the other is
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] so the first one bounces and the second to
> > > this list gets here.
> > >
> > > Look for a place your adding the Essen_... address.
> > >
> > I have just entered reply - I did not define any address, and the reply to
> > address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] and no CC.
>
> Maybe Essen_.... is someone subscribed to the list and for some reason it
> returned the message to Ivo instead of the mailing list server.
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sarel Botha | Computer & | +27 341 81341
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | Accounting | BOX 2065, Dundee
> | Services | 3000, South Africa
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "The End is near." -- http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7771/666.htm
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sarel Botha | Computer & | +27 341 81341
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | Accounting | BOX 2065, Dundee
| Services | 3000, South Africa
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The End is near." -- http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7771/666.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
