On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Jorge Matias wrote:
> 1. This is change I had to make. The program "configure" wasn't detecting
> libax25io because this needs libz to compile and program has a mistake.
>
> --- configure Fri Jun 4 03:20:16 1999
> +++ ../../ax25-tools-0.0.2/configure Sat Jun 26 12:26:04 1999
> @@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@
> echo $ac_n "(cached) $ac_c" 1>&6
> else
> ac_save_LIBS="$LIBS"
> -LIBS="-lax25io lz $LIBS"
> +LIBS="-lz -lax25io $LIBS"
> cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<EOF
> #line 1208 "configure"
> #include "confdefs.h"
Hmm... Haven't noticed this but you are probably right. Anyway as none of
the current tools and apps use libax25io this isn't fatal.
> 2. Others changes:
>
> cd /usr/local/include
> mkdir netrose
> cd netrose
> ln -s /usr/include/linux/rose.h rose.h
> cd ../netax25
> ln -s /usr/include/linux/netrom.h kernel_netrom.h
>
> These were the necessary changes to compile ax25-tools package.
> Anyone else had to do this?
It's technically incorrect to use the kernel headers but if it works for
you then fine. I would guess that it won't for most of people (are you
perhaps running a libc5 based system?).
Anyway only the most recent glibc 2.1 versions are truely trouble free
when it comes to the ax25 stuff and headers. For example RH 6.0 does not
have a recent enough glibc (even though it _is_ 2.1). So people will need
to be prepared to fiddle with the headers...
> BTW, what about the node? I was waiting for this package to be released
> to install the "node", because "node" from ax25utils-2.1.42 doesn't work
> with my kernels from 2.2.6 to 2.2.10! I found that this new packages don't
> have the "node" program.
Node (and some other bigger apps like pms, rspfd etc.) will be released as
their own packages by their espective authors from now on. I'm in the
process of making some final adjustments to node and then I'll release it.
A couple of days...
--
--- Tomi Manninen / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / OH2BNS @ OH2RBI.FIN.EU ---
