Tomi Manninen wrote:
> Are you sure you have _working_ net*/*.h headers? That is are you by any
> chance running RH6.0 ? I did some testing and configure seems to always
> say "yes" but it only defines HAVE_NET*_*_H in config.h if the file is
> there and passes the checks. So in essence configure works but the script
> output is misleading.
I have RH6.0, indeed. You`re right, it's just the output of the
configure check that is misleading.
Gruss,
Matthias
--
Two OS engineers facing a petri net chart:
"dead lock in four moves!"
- ANNOUNCE: New ax25 packages Craig Small
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 package... Cathryn Mataga http://junglevision.com
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 pac... Tomi Manninen
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 pac... Craig Small
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 package... Matthias Welwarsky
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 pac... Tomi Manninen
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25... Matthias Welwarsky
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ... Tomi Manninen
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 package... ko6ri
- New ax25 packages: a few small... Tomi Manninen
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 package... Honza - CZ4WAY
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 pac... Craig Small
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 pac... Bob Meyer
- Re: ANNOUNCE: New ax25 package... Honza - CZ4WAY
