Thanks!
Where did you get the information from?
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tomi Manninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Samstag, 16. Oktober 1999 20:24
Betreff: Re: Datagram <-> Virtual Circuit - UI-frames <-> I-frames
>On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Robert Schelander wrote:
>
>> That what I call strange is the following:
>> Also Flexnet on a Windows98 system supports both methods which are
>> called Datagramm (for transfers of IP within UI-frames) and VitualCiruit
>> (for I-frames). When connecting from Flexnet to Linux with setting VC
>> Linux answers the SABM+ correctly with UA- and reads the IP packet
>> within the I frame. The thing that I call strange now, is that Linux
answers
>> again with UI after some packets and Flexnet automatically goes to
>> Datagram mode unless I tell Flexnet to keep VC permanently. But even
>> with VC set to permanent, Linux insists answering with UI frames.
>
>Linux always uses the mode you have configured in
>/proc/sys/net/ax25/*/ip_default_mode (0 == DG, 1 == VC). No matter how the
>frame came in.
>
>> Do you know how I can tell the linux system to use UI's only for
>> local stations on the local port and use I's for digipeated stations
>> which log in from the port which is connected to a link.
>
>That is not possible AFAIK.
>
>--
>Tomi Manninen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>OH2BNS AX.25: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>KP20ME04 Amprnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
