> And again, I do not see a _single_ reason to break binary compatibility > for applications apart from ax25spyd & Co. If this is so important for you I will do it the compatible way. I think the time needed for this discussion can be used more sensible. I will leave this socket-interface stuff to somebody else. Sigh. But what I would really like to nail down is that driver primitive thing. I would like to know what the other driver developers think of my idea posted in that other mail. -- Jens
- Re: API and driver interface Jens David
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Thorsten Kranzkowski
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Gerd
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Bob Krasko
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Jens David
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Joerg Reuter
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Jens David
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Joerg Reuter DL1BKE
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Thorsten Kranzkowski
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Thorsten Kranzkowski
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Craig Small
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Thorsten Kranzkowski
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Terry Dawson
- Re: DG2FEF-AX.25 Patch for 2.2.14 available Michele A Debandi
