No. So sue me.
jk
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, you wrote:
>Did we post the permission slip from ARRL to republish that
>article? Sorry to be a stick in the mud but let's get real. It
>is legal to copy this for your personal use. I am sure it is
>not legal under any possible reading of copyright law for
>you to copy and then post it.
>
>Bob
>
>
>
>At 10:38 AM 01/28/2000 Friday , you wrote:
>>Hello James, hello all,
>>
>>
>>> A few of you asked for copies of the January 2000 issue of QST's MX614
>>> packet modem article.
>>>
>>> I have scanned and zipped it to
>>> "http://www.rio.com/~kg7fu/qst0100.zip"
>>> (Since this is copywritten material, it will only stay on this site
>>> for a few days.
>>
>>Unfortunately, all the files in that archive fail CRC check and are thus
>>damaged. Only the file containing page 45 (qst0100p45.gif) can be read.
>>
>>I am sorry having to tell you this but there may have been problems uploading
>>that ZIP file.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>
>>Gerd
>>--
>>Gerd Roethig
>>Universit�t Leipzig, Medizinische Klinik u. PK I
>>Johannisallee 32, 04103 Leipzig
>>Tel. (0341) 97 12622, Fax (0341) 97 12515
--
-----------------------------
James S. Kaplan KG7FU
Eugene Oregon USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rio.com/~kg7fu
ICQ # 1227639
Have YOU tried Linux today?
-----------------------------
