Howdy, Jean-Paul:
Interesting. I had no idea. Around here we use clones of 'NET/ROM'.
G8BPQ, THENET/X1J, MSYS, and such. I know of no flex, rose, or fpac
within 100 kilometers. :-|
73, Chuck nc8q
Jean-Paul ROUBELAT wrote:
>
> From: Chuck Gelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Howdy, Y'all:
> >
> > IMHO, digipeating is obsolete.
>
> Digipeating is maybe obsolete but digipeater fields are not. They are mainly
> used for routing information within networks (flex, rose, fpac, etc...)
>
> >
> > 73, Chuck nc8q
> >
> >
> > Joerg Reuter wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > the existing API for AX.25 sockets is a bit too liberal concerning
> > > the size of the sockaddr structure. It makes the code hard to read
> > > (thus difficult to maintain) and almost impossible to implement
> > > alternative ideas. In fact, we have three different structures to
> > > choose from:
> > >
> > > - struct sockaddr_ax25 (obsolete, does not allow digipeaters)
> > <snip>
> >
>
> 73,
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jean-Paul ROUBELAT - F6FBB | Computers are like air-conditioners :
> Packet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | they stop working properly as soon as
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | you open windows.
> WEB : http://www.f6fbb.org |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
