FPAC/ROSE both provide hop-hop acks and with very low overhead (only about 3-5 chars/packet, besides you do not have to reduce your packet size to take into account network overhead. I also believe that FlexNet does the same. On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 13:09:54 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >OK. But standard AX.25 doesn't have hop-hop ack, does it? >Only NET/ROM does? Chuck Hast e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---- FPAC ---- www.qsl.net/fpac/
- VC and datagram mode? Arno Verhoeven
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Jose R. Marte A.
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Arno Verhoeven
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Tomi Manninen
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Hamish Moffatt
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Thomas Sailer
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Hamish Moffatt
- RE: VC and datagram mode? Wilson G. Hein
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Thomas Sailer
- Re: VC and datagram mode? Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
- Chuck Hast
