Craig Small wrote: > It sounds like you are re-writing an awful lot, that's fine too. If you > are removing ioctls, let's add the new ones in leave the old ones there > then remove the old ones. Look at what was done with ipchains/ipfwadm. Of cause. Here the same rules apply as with the socket API. > I think merging could be a good idea, let's see what others think. > I have strong objections to calling it ax25-utils; this would be a "new" > package and you have the choice of what to call it and you go for one of > the three words that can cause confusion when you could choose anything > except -utils -apps or -tools and there would be NO confusion at all. The problem is the good ones are all taken. Even "squid" is. :) -- Jens
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 ... Tomi Manninen
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.... Jens David
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 fo... Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 fo... Jorge Matias
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 fo... Jens David
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.... Richard Adams
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5 Craig Small
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel.... Shawn T. Rutledge
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel.... Jens David
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 ... Craig Small
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.... Jens David
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5 Joerg Reuter
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel.... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 ... Joerg Reuter
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel.... Jens David
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 ... Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.... Joerg Reuter
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 ... Joerg Reuter
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5 ron jochems
- RE: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5 Richard Bown
- RPM of new ax25 stuff Craig Small
