> Thank goodness. I was just going to say -- at least use standard formats.
> The QEX 81-98 CD is ugly to view in Linux (uses a mix of TIF and JPG
> files from memory);
TIFF and JPEG aren't standard formats?
Actually, I've been thinking about putting something together for Linux to allow
reading the QST (QST View), QEX and NCJ CD-ROM collections. Having the images in
TIFF/JPEG format makes that a lot more feasible.
> I don't think the QST 98 CD (for example) is viewable
> at all.
That's correct; it was made using Microsoft's Media View product (sort of an enhanced
Windows help file). No new ARRL products will use that.
> The AView program is yuck.
Not a particularly informative comment. Did you have some specific gripe or were you
just trying to be insulting?
Jon
--
Jon Bloom, KE3Z
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronic Publications Manager
(CD-ROM publications, software products and Web site)
