On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:28:56AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by
> attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have
> their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS
> (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions).
> 
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct tc_pedit.
> Additionally, since the element count member must be set before accessing
> the annotated flexible array member, move its initialization earlier.
> 
> [1] 
> https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci
> 
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
> Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> ---
>  net/sched/act_pedit.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_pedit.c b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
> index 1ef8fcfa9997..77c407eff3b0 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_pedit.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
> @@ -515,11 +515,11 @@ static int tcf_pedit_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> tc_action *a,
>               spin_unlock_bh(&p->tcf_lock);
>               return -ENOBUFS;
>       }
> +     opt->nkeys = parms->tcfp_nkeys;
>  
>       memcpy(opt->keys, parms->tcfp_keys,
>              flex_array_size(opt, keys, parms->tcfp_nkeys));
>       opt->index = p->tcf_index;
> -     opt->nkeys = parms->tcfp_nkeys;
>       opt->flags = parms->tcfp_flags;
>       opt->action = p->tcf_action;
>       opt->refcnt = refcount_read(&p->tcf_refcnt) - ref;
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Gustavo pointed out that the annotation half of this patch in missing.
My mistake! I will figure out where it went. :P Ah, the joys of
splitting up a treewide patch series...

-- 
Kees Cook

Reply via email to