In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:

        VAR + value < VAR

Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
or pointer[4] types.

Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow().
This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future.

Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <b...@kvack.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brau...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-...@kvack.org
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
---
 fs/aio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index bb2ff48991f3..edd19be3f4b1 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static struct kioctx *ioctx_alloc(unsigned nr_events)
        /* limit the number of system wide aios */
        spin_lock(&aio_nr_lock);
        if (aio_nr + ctx->max_reqs > aio_max_nr ||
-           aio_nr + ctx->max_reqs < aio_nr) {
+           add_would_overflow(aio_nr, ctx->max_reqs)) {
                spin_unlock(&aio_nr_lock);
                err = -EAGAIN;
                goto err_ctx;
-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to