On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 5:45 AM Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Yes. We removed this bad behavior by using -fno-strict-overflow, and we will > want to keep it enabled.
Yeah, I only meant that the wording of the commit seems to say there is something special about the "overflowing behavior", i.e. I was expecting just UB with the usual implications, but given the extra text in the parenthesis, I wondered while reading it if there was something different/special going on. > The stack usage is separate. (This may even be fixed in modern Clang; this > comes from the original version of this Kconfig.) The not booting part is > separate and has not been tracked down yet. I see. Thanks! In any case, if the sentence means only 32-bit x86, users couldn't still see it. But since this was already in the revert now that I take a look, I guess ignore this :) > I wondered the same -- they were this way when they were removed, so I just > restored them as they were. :) Makes sense :) Cheers, Miguel
