Kees,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 04:08:39PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> The kernel is globally removing the ambiguous 0-length and 1-element
> arrays in favor of flexible arrays, so that we can gain both compile-time
> and run-time array bounds checking[1].
> 
> While struct fealist is defined as a "fake" flexible array (via a
> 1-element array), it is only used for examination of the first array
> element. Walking the list is performed separately, so there is no reason
> to treat the "list" member of struct fealist as anything other than a
> single entry. Adjust the struct and code to match.
> 
> Additionally, struct fea uses the "name" member either as a dynamic
> string, or is manually calculated from the start of the struct. Redefine
> the member as a flexible array.
> 
> No machine code output differences are produced after these changes.
> 
> [1] For lots of details, see both:
>     
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
>     https://people.kernel.org/kees/bounded-flexible-arrays-in-c
> 
> Cc: Steve French <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paulo Alcantara <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shyam Prasad N <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tom Talpey <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifspdu.h |  4 ++--
>  fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h b/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h
> index 623caece2b10..add73be4902c 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifspdu.h
> @@ -2583,7 +2583,7 @@ struct fea {
>       unsigned char EA_flags;
>       __u8 name_len;
>       __le16 value_len;
> -     char name[1];
> +     char name[];
>       /* optionally followed by value */
>  } __attribute__((packed));
>  /* flags for _FEA.fEA */
> @@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ struct fea {
>  
>  struct fealist {
>       __le32 list_len;
> -     struct fea list[1];
> +     struct fea list;
>  } __attribute__((packed));
>  
>  /* used to hold an arbitrary blob of data */
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> index 60dd4e37030a..7c587157d030 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> @@ -5787,7 +5787,7 @@ CIFSSMBQAllEAs(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon 
> *tcon,
>  
>       /* account for ea list len */
>       list_len -= 4;
> -     temp_fea = ea_response_data->list;
> +     temp_fea = &ea_response_data->list;
>       temp_ptr = (char *)temp_fea;
>       while (list_len > 0) {
>               unsigned int name_len;
> @@ -5902,7 +5902,7 @@ CIFSSMBSetEA(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon 
> *tcon,
>       else
>               name_len = strnlen(ea_name, 255);
>  
> -     count = sizeof(*parm_data) + ea_value_len + name_len;
> +     count = sizeof(*parm_data) + 1 + ea_value_len + name_len;
>       pSMB->MaxParameterCount = cpu_to_le16(2);
>       /* BB find max SMB PDU from sess */
>       pSMB->MaxDataCount = cpu_to_le16(1000);
> @@ -5926,14 +5926,14 @@ CIFSSMBSetEA(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon 
> *tcon,
>       byte_count = 3 /* pad */  + params + count;
>       pSMB->DataCount = cpu_to_le16(count);
>       parm_data->list_len = cpu_to_le32(count);
> -     parm_data->list[0].EA_flags = 0;
> +     parm_data->list.EA_flags = 0;
>       /* we checked above that name len is less than 255 */
> -     parm_data->list[0].name_len = (__u8)name_len;
> +     parm_data->list.name_len = (__u8)name_len;
>       /* EA names are always ASCII */
>       if (ea_name)
> -             strncpy(parm_data->list[0].name, ea_name, name_len);
> -     parm_data->list[0].name[name_len] = 0;
> -     parm_data->list[0].value_len = cpu_to_le16(ea_value_len);
> +             strncpy(parm_data->list.name, ea_name, name_len);

Could non-applying this patch cause false-positive fortify_panic?
We got a bug report from user of 6.1.73:

   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel: detected buffer overflow in 
strncpy
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel: ------------[ cut here 
]------------
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel: kernel BUG at 
lib/string_helpers.c:1027!
   ...
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel: Call Trace:
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  <TASK>
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? __die_body.cold+0x1a/0x1f
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? die+0x2b/0x50
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? do_trap+0xcf/0x120
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? fortify_panic+0xf/0x11
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? do_error_trap+0x83/0xb0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? fortify_panic+0xf/0x11
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? fortify_panic+0xf/0x11
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? fortify_panic+0xf/0x11
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  CIFSSMBSetEA.cold+0xc/0x18 
[cifs]
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  cifs_xattr_set+0x596/0x690 
[cifs]
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? 
evm_protected_xattr_common+0x41/0xb0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  __vfs_removexattr+0x52/0x70
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  
__vfs_removexattr_locked+0xbc/0x150
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  vfs_removexattr+0x56/0x100
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  removexattr+0x58/0x90
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? get_vtime_delta+0xf/0xb0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? 
ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0+0x6b/0x80
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? __ct_user_enter+0x5a/0xd0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? 
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x31/0x50
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? int80_emulation+0xb9/0x110
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? get_vtime_delta+0xf/0xb0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? 
ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0+0x6b/0x80
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? __ct_user_enter+0x5a/0xd0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? __fget_light.part.0+0x83/0xd0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  
__ia32_sys_fremovexattr+0x80/0xa0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  int80_emulation+0xa9/0x110
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? get_vtime_delta+0xf/0xb0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? vtime_user_exit+0x1c/0x70
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? __ct_user_exit+0x6c/0xc0
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  ? int80_emulation+0x1b/0x110
   Jan 24 15:15:20 kalt2test.dpt.local kernel:  asm_int80_emulation+0x16/0x20

I don't find this patch appled to stable/linux-6.1.y.

Thanks,

ps. (Unfortunately `CIFSSMBSetEA+0xc` address is not resolvable to the
actual line inside of CIFSSMBSetEA pointing just to the head of it.

   (gdb) l *CIFSSMBSetEA+0xc
   0x6de3c is in CIFSSMBSetEA (fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:5776).
   5771    int
   5772    CIFSSMBSetEA(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
   5773                 const char *fileName, const char *ea_name, const void 
*ea_value,
   5774                 const __u16 ea_value_len, const struct nls_table 
*nls_codepage,
   5775                 struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb)
   5776    {
   5777            struct smb_com_transaction2_spi_req *pSMB = NULL;
   5778            struct smb_com_transaction2_spi_rsp *pSMBr = NULL;
   5779            struct fealist *parm_data;
   5780            int name_len;

But there is only one strncpy there.

> +     parm_data->list.name[name_len] = '\0';
> +     parm_data->list.value_len = cpu_to_le16(ea_value_len);
>       /* caller ensures that ea_value_len is less than 64K but
>       we need to ensure that it fits within the smb */
>  
> @@ -5941,7 +5941,7 @@ CIFSSMBSetEA(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon 
> *tcon,
>            negotiated SMB buffer size BB */
>       /* if (ea_value_len > buffer_size - 512 (enough for header)) */
>       if (ea_value_len)
> -             memcpy(parm_data->list[0].name+name_len+1,
> +             memcpy(parm_data->list.name + name_len + 1,
>                      ea_value, ea_value_len);
>  
>       pSMB->TotalDataCount = pSMB->DataCount;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Reply via email to